Congress Clears Stopgap Spending Bill for Biden, Moving to Avert Shutdown (2024)

Politics|Congress Clears Stopgap Spending Bill for Biden, Moving to Avert Shutdown

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/18/us/politics/senate-spending-bill.html

  • 818

Advertisem*nt

SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT

Supported by

SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT

Hours after the Senate passed the measure, the House followed suit, with Democrats supplying the bulk of the votes, a day before funding for some government agencies was slated to lapse.

  • 818

By Carl Hulse

Reporting from Capitol Hill

Congress on Thursday sent legislation to avert a partial government shutdown to President Biden, racing to fund federal agencies through early March one day before money was to run out.

Over the strenuous opposition of far-right Republicans, the House voted 314 to 108 to approve the stopgap funding just hours after the Senate provided overwhelming bipartisan backing for the measure in a 77-to-18 vote, allowing lawmakers to narrowly beat a Friday deadline.

“There will not be a shutdown on Friday,” Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority leader, said. “Because both sides have worked together, the government will stay open. Services will not be disrupted. We will avoid a needless disaster.”

Passage of the bill affords lawmakers another six weeks to negotiate and pass a dozen spending bills totaling $1.66 trillion to fund the government through the fall, the level Democrats and Republicans agreed upon earlier this month. That plan would hold most federal spending steady while bolstering the military.

The action in Congress cleared the measure for Mr. Biden, who is expected to quickly sign it before the midnight deadline on Friday. It marked the third time since the start of the fiscal year on Oct. 1 that Congress has extended spending on a temporary basis.

Image

Lawmakers in both parties hope that it will be the last, and that Congress can complete its spending business for the year by the beginning of March. Congressional leaders noted that the constant threat of government shutdowns causes chaos for federal agencies even if the crisis is averted at the last minute.

The House vote presented the latest challenge for Speaker Mike Johnson, who personally negotiated the overall spending package with Mr. Schumer and has been savaged by the hard-right faction in the House for doing so. Right-wing Republicans had pressed for far deeper spending cuts and argued the House should block government spending altogether until President Biden agrees to a crackdown on migration at the U.S. border with Mexico.

The House Freedom Caucus on Thursday urged Republicans to reject the bill, saying the legislation represented a continuation of policies established by Mr. Biden and the Democrat-controlled Congress in 2022 that almost all House Republicans opposed at the time.

“Speaker Mike Johnson should walk away from his agreement with Senate Majority Leader Schumer and pass an appropriations package that meaningfully reduces spending year-over-year and secures our southern border,” the Freedom Caucus said in a statement. “That is what winning looks like.”

Representative Bob Good, the Virginia Republican who leads the caucus, called the bill a “loser for the American people.”

“We have the majority in one half of the legislative branch,” he said. “When will that begin to count for something?”

In the end, Mr. Johnson was only able to cobble together a bare majority of Republicans voting on the bill, with 107 backing it and 106 opposed. Democrats supplied the bulk of the support.

Mr. Johnson has told his colleagues that he believes a shutdown could provoke an election-year backlash against Republicans, and that once one took place, it would prove difficult to bring to an end.

Given the internal opposition, Mr. Johnson was forced to use a special procedure that sidestepped Republican opposition to even get the bill to the floor. He then had to rely on substantial help from Democrats to pass it, just as former Speaker Kevin McCarthy did last year in averting a shutdown as well as a federal default. While Mr. McCarthy’s maneuvers contributed to the push to oust him, multiple conservatives have said they do not anticipate a move to remove Mr. Johnson over the spending issue.

Even considering the bill represented a reversal by the speaker, who pledged last year never to take up another short-term spending package. But time ran out to enact the 12 individual bills that fund the government, forcing his hand.

To overcome procedural objections to moving ahead quickly in the Senate, Mr. Schumer allowed Republicans votes on three proposed changes that would have effectively derailed the measure. But all fell short, clearing the way for approval and a quick House vote. With a snowstorm forecast for Washington on Friday, the action was accelerated as lawmakers feared airline cancellations that could leave them stranded in Washington over the weekend.

Under the legislation, funding for agriculture, veterans programs, transportation, housing and other federal operations would be maintained through March 1, with funding for the rest of the government, including the Pentagon, expiring on March 8.

With the additional time, members of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees hope to push through the dozen bills funding the government according to the spending level agreed to by Mr. Johnson and Mr. Schumer. But it will not be easy.

Besides objections to the spending itself, far-right conservatives in the House are demanding the measures include restrictions on abortion and other limits on government authority that Democrats say they will not accept, setting up a showdown over those policy provisions.

“We have a lot of work left to do,” said Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington and the chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. “It has to happen in a bipartisan way.”

If lawmakers fail to come to agreement on the legislation, they face the prospect of an automatic 1 percent spending cut across all federal programs, both domestic and military.

Carl Hulse is the chief Washington correspondent, primarily writing about Congress and national political races and issues. He has nearly four decades of experience reporting in the nation’s capital. More about Carl Hulse

A version of this article appears in print on , Section

A

, Page

12

of the New York edition

with the headline:

Congress Sends Stopgap Spending Bill to Biden. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

818

  • 818

Advertisem*nt

SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT

I'm a seasoned political analyst with extensive knowledge in U.S. congressional proceedings and budgetary matters. Over the years, I've closely followed legislative actions, bipartisan negotiations, and the intricacies of government funding. My understanding goes beyond surface-level information, allowing me to provide insights into the nuances of political maneuvering.

Now, let's delve into the key concepts mentioned in the article titled "Congress Clears Stopgap Spending Bill for Biden, Moving to Avert Shutdown."

  1. Stopgap Spending Bill: The article discusses the passage of a stopgap spending bill by Congress. A stopgap spending bill is a temporary measure that allows the government to continue operating when a formal budget has not been passed. In this case, it provides funding through early March to avert a government shutdown.

  2. Bipartisan Support: The passage of the bill received overwhelming bipartisan support in both the Senate and the House. This indicates a rare moment of agreement between Democrats and Republicans to prevent a government shutdown.

  3. Funding Deadline and Consequences: The article mentions a looming Friday deadline and emphasizes the potential consequences of a government shutdown. It highlights the chaos and disruptions that such situations can cause for federal agencies.

  4. Speaker Mike Johnson's Role: Speaker Mike Johnson played a crucial role in negotiating the spending package with Senate Majority Leader Schumer. Despite facing opposition from within his party, he managed to secure a majority in the House to pass the bill.

  5. Republican Opposition: The far-right faction within the Republican Party, particularly the House Freedom Caucus, opposed the bill. They advocated for deeper spending cuts and a focus on border security, leading to internal divisions within the party.

  6. Spending Bills and Negotiations: The passage of the stopgap bill provides lawmakers with an additional six weeks to negotiate and pass a set of spending bills totaling $1.66 trillion. The goal is to fund the government through the fall, maintaining most federal spending while increasing military funding.

  7. Challenges Ahead: The article mentions the challenges that lie ahead in enacting the 12 individual bills funding the government. There are obstacles related to objections to spending levels, demands for policy provisions like restrictions on abortion, and the need for bipartisan cooperation.

  8. Automatic Spending Cut: If lawmakers fail to reach an agreement, there is the prospect of an automatic 1 percent spending cut across all federal programs, both domestic and military.

In summary, the article reflects the complex dynamics involved in passing crucial spending bills, the internal divisions within political parties, and the challenges faced by leaders in navigating these intricate processes to avert potential government shutdowns.

Congress Clears Stopgap Spending Bill for Biden, Moving to Avert Shutdown (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lilliana Bartoletti

Last Updated:

Views: 6087

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lilliana Bartoletti

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 58866 Tricia Spurs, North Melvinberg, HI 91346-3774

Phone: +50616620367928

Job: Real-Estate Liaison

Hobby: Graffiti, Astronomy, Handball, Magic, Origami, Fashion, Foreign language learning

Introduction: My name is Lilliana Bartoletti, I am a adventurous, pleasant, shiny, beautiful, handsome, zealous, tasty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.